Who's Who Worldwide Registry Tragedy
certainly qualifies for Smelly Trials of the Century 

  Remember 911day.   Talk less; do more!  
                         
           

Just try to imagine an attorney asking a jury to find his client guilty.

No "ifs, and's, maybe's," or qualifiers. Just, "... And when I come back to this case I will ask you to return a verdict of guilty. Thank you very much."
"Remember, it is a salesman, a person not in management decisions . He is basically told certain things, and he followed it in a -- way, he believed what he is doing . I ask you to use your common sense, listen to the witnesses, and you determine if the witnesses who were members of Who's Who got what they want. Ask yourself this question: Did this organization actually deceive, people who were of a higher -- who were high up in industry? Are the leaders of this country, and of major businesses in the world, people with big jobs that are successful in their everyday lives, were they misled by Who's Who, or did they get what they want? Are these the types of people who could be easily deceived? Does that make any sense to you? You know, ladies and gentlemen, you hear things about presumption of innocence and burden of proof . I just ask that you give it a lot of thought . These are principles that we all have.
 
If we put a blanket over Mr. Rubin, and you didn't see his face, and didn't see his hands, he could be anybody. He could be me, he could be you, he could be your spouse, he could be your child . But he would be protected by the principles of law that make this country great, and they are for all of us. I will ask you to listen to the evidence, follow the law . And when I come back to this case I will ask you to return a verdict of guilty. Thank you very much."
 
DEFENSE attorney's statement to jury!!

NOTE: Postal Inspector Biegelman, who tasked with opening and running a multi-year, multi-million dollar investigation into Who's Who Worldwide, while in the pay of Reed Elsevier (WWW Registry's number one competitor), allegedly invested thousands of hours of his time investigating and running this case...... ... and did indeed appear at the pre-trial hearings, yet became suddenly "unavailable for trial" on the very eve of trial... ... and although the trial lasted for several months, Agent Beigelman never once came near the courtroom, missing in action at the Court's leisure.
 

Does something smell fishy here to you?

This is the same judge who, having examined this case carefully for many days, nights, weeks, and even months, dismissed this paradigm of calumny, only to utterly reverse his own opinion after thousands of pages of EXCULPATORY TESTIMONY and EVIDENCE!!
 
There was a time, and not so distantly in past, when judges were held stictly accountable. That can hardly be said of the current judicial system as it operates today. In thiis virtually unique trial, surely among the dirtiest trials of the 20th century, there can be no doubt of the fact that the judge acted improperly... repeatedly!
 
For doubting Thomases, this is the judge who, when a sitting juror, nervous, and clearly shaking with fear, entered a courtroom alone of the jurors to testify on the stand that "there are people in there who are putting pressure on us," and "...people who are making decisions for..." only to be interrupted repeatedly by the judge, who glared and waved his arms, yelling, "Ah! Ah! I don't want to hear it!!"
 
When another juror claimed that her Mercedes Benz had been hit and damaged in the courthouse parking lot by a Mercedes Benz owned by a female defendant, and it was made clear that the other jurors were being harangued about this by that Mercedes-owning juror, the judge did nothing, and did not excuse the juror.
 
Only after days of the juror complaining, and writing notes to the court about submitting bills and claims, did the outrageous nature of conduct earn her a dismissal, having thoroughly tainted the jury, and convincing them that all of the defendants must be rich, and guilty.
 
Even when the judge learned that SEVERAL jurors left the courtroom after verdict in tears, mouthing apologives to defendants and defense attorneys, he did nothing to correct this miscarriage of justice.
 
As hard as this may be to believe, it's true: The US Postal Service, being the de facto complainant in this case, successfully placed their own employees on the jury, and neither the judge, nor defense attorneys did anything to prevent this, despite the repeated and vociferous objections of the defendants.
 
How could any conscientious judge allow this? Well, it might be revealing that the sitting judge was reported to "suddenly" have possession, at the very conclusion of this case, of a vehicle that did not merely cost more money than any vehicle that the judge has owned in the past fifty years, rather, which cost more than EVERY VEHICLE he has ever owned...ALL ADDED UP TOGETHER!!
 
In a trial where, statistically, 99.4% of the transcripts and records all related to the publisher of Who's Who Worldwide Registry and his various companies, and NOT EVEN ONE HALF OF ONE PERCENT related to each additional, lower-level employee, the judge still refused to separate the defendants or grant individual trials. As was the norm in this case, the defense attorneys, employed by, and paid for by the federal government, did little to address these and so many other issues, smiling their way through a multitude of absurd judicial decisions that were distinctly against the interests of their clients, never once appealing to a higher court to intercede in this utter suspension of constitutional imperatives.
 

            The Members     Trial Transcript Managing Directors! Best & Brightest   

            Politics       WHAT??!!!       Dirty Jury?  Masters and Millionaires
           

               

Remember to feed those who are hungrier than you by giving, at no cost to you.
The Path of Good Shortcuts and Doctor David Cohen Zen Applaud YOU For Free Clickthroughs
Sponsors purchase 1.1 cups of staple food for starving people for each of YOUR free clicks.
When you click this food button and the one that pops open you save a human life... no charge to you.
There is no more noble effort than feeding someone with no expectation of payment.
What goes around....



  Remember 911day.     Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!   
  Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  



Who's Who Worldwide Registry Trial Tragedy

From the point of view of both the Path of Good Shortcuts and the Doctor David Cohen Zen:

With so little room for doubt, the Who's Who Worldwide Registry Trial Tragedy goes down as a very dirty federal trial,
one conducted in an organized atmosphere of nondisclosure to the press, not before, during, or after the trial.
The three national shows that tried to break this huge story were quickly, effectively quashed.

Dirty Smelly Trials of the Century.

Lasting several months, at a staggering cost to the taxpayer, all in secrecy.
Genuinely a dirty trial amongst the Smelly Trials of the Century.
Governmental postal corruption, Most Despicable Attorney In America, Most Despicable Attorney In America,
American political prisoners of Reed Elsevier, largest media corporation, greediest and perhaps most corrupt multinational corporation..
Who's Who Worldwide Registry tragedy, one of the Federal Cases of Shame On The Judiciary with news blackout quite total...



Let's agree: Any attorney who goes to a jury and asks them to find his client guilty has to indicate something "smelly."
It is inconvevable to many that an attorney would actually ask a jury to find his client guilt.
One good feature of our court system is that there is someone keeping a record,
a record of most everything that occurs in open court, including an "asking."
In this case, the "asking" was indeed recorded, it's in the trial transcript,
yet the judge, who may prove a spectacularly corrupt federal judge,
never said a word, never remonstrated or castigated in any way.

What kind of lawyer asks a jury to find his client guilty?

The Path of Good Shortcuts might dare to say, "a crooked or incompetent attorney."
The Doctor David Cohen Zen might well agree that there is corruption or incompetitence present.
The challenge with THAT is simple: you cannot ask a jury to find your client guilty "by accident," can you?
Hence, an agile mind is going to lean in one of these two directions simply by dint of logic and from experience.
Thus, it does not seem unreasonable to consider Thomas F.X. Dunn among the dirtiest of attorneys in the U.S. of A.
Not that the judge gets off. Judge Spatt was seen, just after the "finish," the putative closure of this particular case,
driving a big vehicle that cost... not merely more than any vehicle that Judge Arthur Spatt had ever purchased in his life,
no, no, it cost more than ALL of the vehicles purchased by Judge Arthur Spatt over his entire lifetime of buying cheap cars.
If the judge can explain this "coincidence," (the Path of Good Shortcuts and Doctor David Cohen Zen don't believe in coincidence),
then some may too-rapidly infer or conclude that Judge Spatt is not among the most corrupt of all federal district court judges, right?
Sadly, there are too many other factors in the Who'w Who Worldwide case that simply smack and smell of odious conduct from the judiciary.
One need not heed the asseverations or suppositions of the Path of Good Shortcuts or the Doctor David Cohen Zen in looking at this dirty case.

One need only read the trial transcripts to see the bizarre nature of what is surely among the dirtiest trials in the history of juridical intervention in U.S. history.



Dirtiest Trials of the 20th Century - Miscarriages of Justice

How rare it is to find a case that offers literally dozens of serious justifications for reversal of conviction.
The Who's Who case was studied by a respected federal judge for many months,
who found that no crime had been committed, and dismissed the case.

Reed Elsevier, Ltd, as the richest and most powerful publisher in over a hundred countries around the world,
accurately described as one of the most corrupt corporations operating operating on the planet today,
undermined the foundations of American justice in the Who's Who Worldwide case with cash and more.

Examine a trial where less than twenty percent of the proceedings had ANY connection to defendants
That alone has required a separation of trials. In this case, NT EVEN ONE PERCENT of the proceedings,
accusations, presented evidence, or accepted facts, had anything to do with the "sales" defendants.

The Who's Who Worldwide case was all about Bruce Gordon, his machinations and his accountant,
and the many companies operated in secrecy by Gordon and Liz Sauter, his true "henchman."

For hundreds of the most boring hours, all discussion was about Gordon and his actions.
Prosecution witness after prosecution witness exculpated the sales defendants, but,
this same judge who had previously dismissed the case after months of study,
who may have been constitutionally unable to resist pressure from above,
was in fact pressured, and demonstrated a caving in to that pressure.
This pressure came from federal court of appeals above him,
Remember that Reed Elsevier is the most powerful force
in the American arena of jurisprudence today.

This miscarriage of justice can be fixed by granting a new trial
or a Presidential Pardon. Please call 202-456-1414 to lift your voice.

Dirtiest trials of the 20th Century || Worst Attorneys In America Thomas FX Dunn chief among them

Dirtiest trials of the 20th century - with full news media blackout.
However long you live, please remember the name of Thomas FX Dunn,
perhaps the worst attorney in history, the worst lawyer of all time.






Now The Path of Good Shortcuts Is Asking

Asking the skinny and asking the fat,
what kind of lawyer is asking for that?
"Guilt" is what he is asking for up here,
thinking he's asking for financial good cheer.
If Dunn is a whore, who keeps asking for more,
why didn't Judge Spatt toss him right out the door?

Asking for guilt, he's actually asking them to find guilt!
This moron should be fired, and made to walk on some stilts.
Asking for guilt, this coprophile beseeched them to find guilt,
his brain must scan up like some truly perverted quilt.
A mix and a match of imbecilic inclinations,
asking has earned him a self-defenestration.

Asking and then asking, it only took once,
it's why Thomas Dunn proves dumb as a dunce.
Or was it intentional, this asking for guilt,
is this how an execrable brain gets built?

The Who's Who Worldwide Registry Trial, going on day after day,
dealing for many weeks with JUST Bruce Gordon's egregiosities;
costing the taxpayer so many bags of money unnecessarily and poorly focused, all in secrecy,
a despicable federal trial repeatedly demonstrated to be seriously and repeatedly flawed,
has to be fairly counted among the dirtiest trials of the 20th century.


Seventy dollar socks, jaunts to Europe, multiple suicides, postal corruption, the worst attorneys in America,
perhaps the worst attorneys of all time,
American political prisoners of corporate corruption, it's all here:

suspiciously expensive vehicle driven by a judge who'd driven cheap cars for fifty years;
evidence disappearing from supposedly secure courthouse evidence rooms,
and let's not leave out Reed Elsevier and their endless supply of cash
for purchasing postal inspectors and pretty much anyone in the judiciary they target. multiple jury tainting,
the largest number of the worst lawyers you have ever seen gathered in a single trial
despite the statistical near-impossibility of such a feat,
where every defense lawyer but one had an eighty percent --
or higher -- loss rate over the preceding five years.
The Who's Who Worldwide Registry tragedy,
one of the Dirtiest Trials of the 20th Century amidst a news media blackout